This week I visited Malmedy in Belgium. I took my FT-817nd with me and was very briefly active as
ON/PD0RLH/P/QRP (how is that for a short call sign ;-)
Info on my radio amateur activities (like WWFF nature park activation), background to my station and general ham radio info (propagation, portable gear, etc.).
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Ventenna dipole versus HyEndFed vertical
After acquiring my first half wave end fed by PA3EKE (HyEndFed) I was curious how it would perform compared to my Ventenna dipole.
The Ventenna is a portable dipole - developed in and sold from the US - that consists of various elements that you can screw together to make a resonant dipole for different bands. When I started on HF in 2010 I used this antenna in the attic to make my first contacts.
The HyEndFed is an end fed wire antenna. PA3EKE sells it in single and multiband configuration. The first one I bought was the 20m 300w PEP version.
For the test I set up the Ventenna portable
dipole on a aluminum push up mast @ 9m and the HyEndFed end fed half wave wire vertically on a Spieth “fishing rod” at 12m (feeding point at 2m).
![]() |
Ventenna dipole on push up mast |
The
dipole was turned into the direction of the station being worked.
There was a considerable amount of QSB on 20m making the comparison difficult. Outcome after 2 hours of testing:
o Local contacts (40km
range) reported 2 to 3 s-units of difference in favour
of the vertical wire
o European contacts
(2000km range) reported no significant differences in the two set-ups
o DX contacts (US and
Canada, 6000km range) reported 1 s-unit of difference in favour
of the vertical wire
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)